Skip to main content

Loopio vs Responsive (formerly RFPIO)

A side-by-side comparison of Loopio and Responsive for U.S. contractors — features, pricing, and who each tool best suits. Honest about where each is genuinely stronger.

TL;DR

Loopio: Loopio is an enterprise RFP response platform. It centralizes an answer library, routes RFP/RFI/security-questionnaire responses to subject-matter experts, and tracks completion across deals. Strong in U.S. commercial enterprise sales.

Responsive (formerly RFPIO): Responsive (rebranded from RFPIO) is a U.S.-headquartered enterprise RFP/RFI/security-questionnaire response platform with a strong answer library, automation rules, and AI assist features. Largely serves U.S. commercial enterprise sales teams.

Loopio vs Responsive: side-by-side

FeatureLoopioResponsive (formerly RFPIO)
CategoryRFP responseRFP response
OriginCanada · founded 2014USA · founded 2015 (rebranded from RFPIO in 2022)
Primary audienceEnterprise sales / proposal teamsMid-market and enterprise proposal teams
Pricing modelAnnual enterprise contracts; commonly $15k+/yr range, custom-quotedAnnual enterprise contracts, custom-quoted; commonly starting in the $10k–$20k/yr range
Federal contracting focusNoNo
Free planNoNo
Live SAM.gov feedNoNo
Proposal libraryYesYes
Solicitation parserYesYes
AI proposal draftingLimited / assistLimited / assist

Where Loopio is stronger

  • Best-in-class answer library and subject-matter-expert routing workflow for very large response teams
  • Strong integrations with Salesforce, Slack and major enterprise sales stacks

Where Responsive is stronger

  • Deep answer-library management at scale (10,000+ entries)
  • Mature integrations with Salesforce, Microsoft 365 and major sales platforms

Best for Loopio

Mid-market or enterprise sales teams responding to dozens of commercial vendor RFPs per month across regulated industries.

Best for Responsive

U.S. enterprise sales teams managing high-volume commercial vendor RFPs with a large dedicated proposal function.

There's also a third option

GovCon — AI proposal writing built for U.S. small businesses

If you're a U.S. company bidding on federal contracts, GovCon is purpose-built for the job — federal contracting specialism, AI drafting, integrated live SAM.gov feed, free plan, and per-seat pricing from $49/mo. No annual enterprise contract required.

Start free →See pricing

FAQs

What's the difference between Loopio and Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?

Loopio is rfp response for enterprise sales / proposal teams. Responsive is rfp response for mid-market and enterprise proposal teams. The full feature-by-feature breakdown is in the table on this page.

Which is better for federal contracting — Loopio or Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?

Loopio has no specific federal contracting focus; Responsive has no federal contracting focus. For U.S. companies bidding on federal contracts, contract vehicles and agency work, the more specialist option is usually the better starting point — but worth weighing against the rest of the comparison table.

Is Loopio cheaper than Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?

Loopio's pricing: Annual enterprise contracts; commonly $15k+/yr range, custom-quoted. Responsive's pricing: Annual enterprise contracts, custom-quoted; commonly starting in the $10k–$20k/yr range. Whichever fits your team's size, contract length, and per-bid economics best is the right answer — both can work out cheaper depending on your situation.

Who should pick Loopio?

Mid-market or enterprise sales teams responding to dozens of commercial vendor RFPs per month across regulated industries.

Who should pick Responsive (formerly RFPIO)?

U.S. enterprise sales teams managing high-volume commercial vendor RFPs with a large dedicated proposal function.

Related comparisons

Loopio vs Qvidian (Upland Software)Responsive (formerly RFPIO) vs Qvidian (Upland Software)Loopio vs ProposifyResponsive (formerly RFPIO) vs ProposifyAutogenAI vs LoopioAutogenAI vs Responsive (formerly RFPIO)Loopio vs DealHubResponsive (formerly RFPIO) vs DealHub

See all GovCon comparisons.